Smashburger’s new CEO Jim Sullivan says the brand is “back in growth mode,” pointing to new formats and value-tier menu items. It’s a rainbow pitch, full of color and promise.
But the numbers aren’t nearly as bright. Startup costs run $570K to $1.2M with 7 percent in total fees. Average unit volume hovers around $900K, hardly a premium benchmark. Top quartile units push toward $1.2M, but the bottom quartile sinks under $700K — a level that makes breakeven tough once royalties and labor are factored in.
Corporate also insists expansion is underway, with announcements of 12 to 15 planned openings. Yet the brand’s footprint has actually declined by more than four percent in the past year, and systemwide sales are down more than $100 million since 2016.
That disconnect shows up in the data.
The Verdict Breakdown Scorecard doesn’t align with the PR: market positioning is cautious, financial structure is shaky, growth trajectory is in the red, and operational support remains thin.
Customer reviews echo the inconsistency. Some call Smashburger “the best fast-casual burger when ops are on point.” Others describe it as “great one time, disappointing the next.” Training is defined as adequate but rushed, and turnover results in uneven performance across markets.
Smashburger’s leadership talks about acceleration. The data points to a plateau.
👉 Just like sports, the coach will tell you the team is built to win.
The analyst examines the statistics and shows you where the losses accumulate.
Our Intel Reports shine those lights — green, yellow, and red — so operators and investors can decide where to place their bets.
📊 Get the full Smashburger Intel Report — with every scorecard and investor move — inside our research library.
✉️ Not a subscriber? Sign up for weekly No BS Franchise Reports and never miss a red flag or green light.